That, gentle readers, is not a question that is likely to be answered anytime soon, if ever. After my IVF, when things had looked super weird, my RE and I concurred that maybe following my AFC for the next few months would be a good idea. I finally rolled off the procrastination wagon and took myself off to get an antral follicle count (AFC) done. The results floored me.
To recap the madness, mostly for my own records:
I've played around a lot with vitamin D. Not supplementing at all, and just relying on sunlight and diet is a joke, its been proven time and again that this will leave me in the deficiency range. What does deficiency do for me? I also lost a chromosmally normal child in this period, and my luteal phase used to be far too short on occasion. Its not so great from a physiological viewpoint- my health overall has subtly but definitely been improved by bringing me into the sufficiency range. However, how sufficient should I be?
Deficiency of vitamin D is something that has been proven to be a contributor to infertility. But a too high blood level may be equally bad, or worse, in my case.
4000-5000 IU with added calcium was something I felt great on, but *may* have had unanticipated, adverse effects on my reproductive system, which is not surprising in theory, because hey, Vitamin D has been shown without doubt, to be a powerful modulator of this system.
Two thousand IU, the dose I am on now, is a fairly conservative, play-it-safe dose, given all the hot debate on the Vitamin D RDA. The IOM's 2010 recommendation of 600 RDA/day is pretty controversial and has not been well received at all. Other, seemingly saner voices advocate in the 1000-2000 range. The vitamin D council recommends over 4000/day, I believe. Experts at endocrinology are all of differing opinions. In my revised opinion, everybody needs to keep their blood levels around 30 ng/ml, and its best not to go much higher. The amount you may need to get your blood level to 30 may vary from person to person, some trial and error might need to go into how much you need.
So I'll stick with 2000 IU/month for a while and see how I do, longterm. I'm now also going to start the CCRM regimen (melatonin, argenine, myo-insoitol, coQ10 etc) and see how my AFC fares with that. I'm only wondering whether I should wait one more month to start it, to confirm this rise in my AFC. However, I want to be on this atleast for 3 months before we attempt another IVF, which may be necessary very quickly if the transfer to the surrogate next month fails.
But, hey, on the bright side, my issue does not look like ovarian aging. If only I can figure out what exactly it IS, though. Bloody, bloody biology.
Updated: Much, much later, I figured out that the issue is that my RE (Dr. Malpani's) machine is older and has poorer resolution. At the point of my second IVF, we checked in two different machines: my AFC was 16 when using the much older 2D machine, and 24 when using a fancy 4D ultrasound machine. All the scans that showed a high AFC (25-30) were done using the 4D machine. Facepalm moment, for sure.
To recap the madness, mostly for my own records:
- August 2010: AFC = 34 (evenly distributed in both ovaries)
- November 2010 (post 1 pregnancy and 1 loss): discover AMH is paradoxically low and am Vitamin D deficient, correct vitamin D deficiency
- December 2010 ; AFC = 30 (evenly distributed in both ovaries) ; AMH = over 5 ng/ml
- December 2010-April 2011- Take around 4000 IU vitamin D daily
- April 2011: AFC = 16 (11 in one ovary and 5 in the other)
- April 2011-Feb 2011: Add prenatal with extra vitamin D, so total is 5000/day, start taking calcium (50 % of RDA) daily as well.
- Feb 2012: AFC = 16 (but now evenly distributed in both ovaries) AMH = 4.3.
- March 2012: IUI# 3 results in failure
- March-July 2012 - Drop vitamin D dosage to around 3000 IU/day
- June-July 2012- 3rd pregnancy and loss, due to Trisomy 4.
- August 2012-October 2012- drop Vitamin D dose 2500-3000 IU/day, continue calcium, however less regularly. Start Metformin
- October 2012: AFC = 13 (more or less evenly distributed in both ovaries); AMH= 1.6, then 2.6 on retest
- November2012-December 2011: Stop Metformin. Continue vitamin D at 2000 IU. Stop calcium almost completely.
- December 29th 2012: AFC = 25 (evenly distributed in both ovaries)! AMH still pending.
I've played around a lot with vitamin D. Not supplementing at all, and just relying on sunlight and diet is a joke, its been proven time and again that this will leave me in the deficiency range. What does deficiency do for me? I also lost a chromosmally normal child in this period, and my luteal phase used to be far too short on occasion. Its not so great from a physiological viewpoint- my health overall has subtly but definitely been improved by bringing me into the sufficiency range. However, how sufficient should I be?
Deficiency of vitamin D is something that has been proven to be a contributor to infertility. But a too high blood level may be equally bad, or worse, in my case.
4000-5000 IU with added calcium was something I felt great on, but *may* have had unanticipated, adverse effects on my reproductive system, which is not surprising in theory, because hey, Vitamin D has been shown without doubt, to be a powerful modulator of this system.
Two thousand IU, the dose I am on now, is a fairly conservative, play-it-safe dose, given all the hot debate on the Vitamin D RDA. The IOM's 2010 recommendation of 600 RDA/day is pretty controversial and has not been well received at all. Other, seemingly saner voices advocate in the 1000-2000 range. The vitamin D council recommends over 4000/day, I believe. Experts at endocrinology are all of differing opinions. In my revised opinion, everybody needs to keep their blood levels around 30 ng/ml, and its best not to go much higher. The amount you may need to get your blood level to 30 may vary from person to person, some trial and error might need to go into how much you need.
So I'll stick with 2000 IU/month for a while and see how I do, longterm. I'm now also going to start the CCRM regimen (melatonin, argenine, myo-insoitol, coQ10 etc) and see how my AFC fares with that. I'm only wondering whether I should wait one more month to start it, to confirm this rise in my AFC. However, I want to be on this atleast for 3 months before we attempt another IVF, which may be necessary very quickly if the transfer to the surrogate next month fails.
But, hey, on the bright side, my issue does not look like ovarian aging. If only I can figure out what exactly it IS, though. Bloody, bloody biology.
Updated: Much, much later, I figured out that the issue is that my RE (Dr. Malpani's) machine is older and has poorer resolution. At the point of my second IVF, we checked in two different machines: my AFC was 16 when using the much older 2D machine, and 24 when using a fancy 4D ultrasound machine. All the scans that showed a high AFC (25-30) were done using the 4D machine. Facepalm moment, for sure.