General
Overview:
In an email shortly after my first
IVF, Dr. Malpani introduced me to his surrogacy program. What I did not realize
then was that most other REs in Mumbai do not run their own surrogacy programs,
they outsource this to surrogacy agencies (examples: Surrogacy India, Little
Angels), who, atleast going by Surrogacy India’s program, do a very thorough
job of screening and caring for their surrogates.
Dr. Malpani charges a similar amount
of money as them. This is the way he runs his surrogacy program: he has found a
"handler," who has been a surrogate herself in the past. This
appeared to be an uneducated woman. She finds and recruits surrogates and takes
them to him. After he selects a surrogate, the handler seems to handle it all:
she takes these women to their appointments, liaises between the OB's clinic and
gets the reports to Dr. Malpani's clinic eventually (there seems to be a lag of
1-3 days). I was not given copies of the test reports up front. I always had to
ask, sometimes repeatedly. To my great shock, this woman also informed me that
she gives the injections, rather than a trained nurse, as I would have expected.
Trying to get her to convey what injection she had to give was a fun experience
all right, and we ended up with a serious case of crossed wires about the
steroid shot. From my experience, this woman, who basically coordinated the
pregnancy handling was unprofessional (she would avoid my phone calls for days
when she did not want to talk to me), missed appointments (she wanted to
skip out on the 36th week checkup; I spoke to the surrogate and made sure she
turned up, and on that day, we discovered her BP was high enough to warrant
immediate hospitalization) and had no medical know-how.
Surrogacy India'a (SI) program is
something I like a lot. They have an immensely large staff dedicated to the
various aspects of running surrogacy, and there are 2 doctors who have no other
job other than look over the pregnancies. They have housing on their premises,
and make sure that if the surrogates live at home with their family, they
relocate close to their office and can be mobilized rapidly (they have an
ambulance on site to ferry people to Hiranandani hospital). Every blood
test/test report is immediately uploaded and is made available to the
biological parents through their website and they have an electronic record
available at all times (to this day, I have only seen J's file and made copies
of certain things, but do not have all reports of when she was pregnant with my
child). SI staff (who, importantly, are not "friends" or from the
same community as the surrogates) conduct “home visits” to check if the
surrogates have clean drinking water, etc, and they keep checking throughout
the pregnancy. This is important because there have been instances where women
have become Hepatitis E-positive during pregnancy due to unclean drinking water
and miscarried. They also check the husbands every 3 months for STDs (this is
really important and sensible, IMO). They offer very strong and robust
oversight over the entire program, and their pregnancy screening (which appears
to have multiple doctors at very reputed hospitals running and reviewing the
ultrasounds) is very through. They also handle post-pregnancy finances (for
example, if you want to set up an educational trust for your surrogate’s
children, they will handle the disbursement of the finances).
Dr. Malpani, as stated above, seems
to have a staff of one to handle the pregnancy, and it is a woman from the same
community as the surrogates. He assumes the OB will handle all the medical
aspects after the 3rd month. In contrast, SI has assured me that while the OB
does a lot, the two doctors who oversee the team do a lot of monitoring and
keeping tabs throughout the pregnancy. One of the doctors there tried to
impress upon me that this very involved approach pays off- the SI babies
apparently have a higher weight at birth, and rarely require NICU admissions
for medical reasons.
Initial screening:
In the case of the second surrogate
chosen (who eventually went on to carry Gauri), she had told him that she had
been a surrogate once before, with Surrogacy India. I spoke to them and
accidentally found out that she had been a surrogate twice before with them. This
was her 5th child, not her 4th, as she claimed.
What SI repeatedly impressed upon me
is that surrogates lie to try to pass the screenings, because they desperately
need this money. Hence such responsible agencies are very through in their
screenings to prevent a potential disaster from unfolding (such as a surrogate
who has carried 5 babies already and is trying to carry a 6th, and runs into
the risk factors associated with the multigravida state). It is, IMO,
imperative that the doctor doing the screening be exhaustive in his/her
investigations to verify the past medical history.
What Dr. Malpani told me (and what
went on official record) was that she had been a surrogate only once before.
This was contradicted by my verbal exchanges with Surrogacy India, the OB-GYN
(who told me this was her third surrogacy and 5th pregnancy, not her
4th), and finally, J herself, in a conversation after the birth.
Additionally, my surrogate was Rh-,
and he put Rh+ embryos into her. On realizing this by accident (!!) due to the astute questions asked by the excellent
Dr. Bhansal at Mediscan, I asked for and checked her initial blood reports:
there was no report testing whether she was indeed still unimmunized against
the Rh antigen after 4 prior pregnancies. If she had been immunized, it would
have possibly resulted in a pregnancy loss.
Pregnancy management:
During a pregnancy, the nuchal
translucency screening for Down’s syndrome is only accurate if done between 11
weeks and 14 weeks. If Dr. Malpani was aware of this, he did not impress it on
the handler, who of course had no idea. She took the surrogate in to
Hiranandani for the first time only at 14 weeks (based on the ET date),
and she would have missed the window for accurate screening. Thankfully, I had
arranged for the screening myself between the 11th and 12th week,
and had paid for this necessary test (as I had multiple others) from my own
pocket.
Other things that Dr. Malpani did
also vexed me: His receptionist emailed me to tell me that the next payment was
due at 20-22 weeks. A few days later, Dr. Malpani emailed me to tell me that
this payment "due at 20-22 weeks" was now overdue! We were 19w1d
along on that day! You had to laugh, because otherwise you would cry.
Communication was also rather
painful: his fee schedule was such that his own receptionist could
not seem to understand it. He initially emailed me that I have to pay 9000$ in
three installments of $3000 each. I paid the first one. At the time of the next
installment, his receptionist emails me to tell me that my next payment of
$2000 was due (she thought the total payment was only $6000---can’t blame her
given the ambiguity of the schedule, which I will be putting up in the next
post). It took several phone calls to sort it out, and at one point, she told
me Dr. Malpani was charging me the fee for twins, which is why the amount was
higher: I nearly pulled my hair out at that point.
After our relationship turned
hostile because I had expressed my surprise over the way things were handled
and anger over multiple issues (I also had the pregnancy jitters and nerves
that made me fly off the handle far too quickly, and that was my fault) I came
up against a wall. Emails were not returned, questions/concerns were ignored
entirely. The only way I seemed to encounter some action was to write a
blogpost about it.
The shit really hit the fan towards
the end of the pregnancy. J lives in a slum area in a dwelling called a chawl.
It is very difficult to get cars in and out of in case of a medical
emergency. Her bathroom is outside, and I was honestly rather nervous
about her moving around at night when she was so large and unwieldy and groggy
at night: I was afraid of a fall and a placental abruption. It was also summer,
and one day out in the country with no air conditioning had nearly given me
heatstroke, and I was nervous as to how she was coping at nearly full term. I
was also concerned about UTIs at this late date, given that the sanitation is
far from ideal. All in all, I was trying to get her to move for the last 2-3
weeks into safer and more comfortable housing. Most surrogacy agencies, given
the poverty that the surrogates live in, have some arrangement of housing in
case of emergencies, and for the final weeks if required. As a standard
policy, SI told me that the wishes of the biological parents are always taken
into consideration while deciding where the surrogate will spend the final
weeks.
As mentioned previously, Dr. Malpani
offers one uneducated woman to coordinate the whole process, in combination
with his oversight of the pregnancy (you can decide the state of that based on
what I told you above). He offers no housing to house surrogates that I was
made aware of, no means of transport in case of an emergency (J would have had
to hail a cab in that neighborhood and make her way with the handler, who was
pregnant herself). Anyway, given the lack of acceptable housing and knowledge
of her home situation, I was happier with the surrogate spending the last 2-3
weeks in the hospital where she would be well monitored. I had discussed
this with the surrogate, and she told me she was willing to get admitted on the
2nd of April, which would be the 36th week.
However, when we went in for the 35th week checkup, her blood pressure was
high, and the OB-GYN admitted her for monitoring, as per her standard policy.
Note that the surrogate was not happy with this. She was also started on IV
antibiotics for a suspected vaginal infection, and this was continued for
around 4 days. I wanted the surrogate to be in the hospital till delivery (I
suspected we would not get very far past 37 weeks).
One day, I tried to contact the
surrogate to just see how things were going, and I could not get through. Nobody took my calls that day. Frantic,
I finally texted the OB, and apparently verbal exchanges between the OB and Dr.
Malpani had taken place, resulting in the surrogate being discharged “Discharged
Against Medical Advice.” This was what the OB told me, and she also informed me
via text, that Dr. Malpani was aware of it. He had not bothered communicating
all this to me. I literally needed sedation that night, I was that terrified.
My state of mind just did not seem to matter. Importantly, he gave me no
information either about the discharge or about her state of her health (I did
not know if the BP had settled, or whether her antibiotic treatment was
complete). Things were only explained (and became less frightening) when my
mother went and talked to the OB the next day, and she explained that she had
taken all possible precautions before letting the surrogate be discharged
against medical advice.
Since I was not on good terms with Dr. Malpani
at this time, my mother, who is a doctor, called him about when J could go back
to the hospital. My mother, who was a lot more level headed and far less
paranoid than I was, was also having nightmares about J, who was a 5th
gravida, delivering in a cab in the middle of the night, as labor can progress
very rapidly in these women. When my mother conveyed these fears to Dr. Malpani
on the phone, he responded that birth is a natural process and women have been
delivering for millennia without OBs hovering over them (!!!). Obviously, this
did not reassure her, and she emphasized that she wanted the delivery to take
place in a hospital “natural birth process or otherwise.” He also famously told
her that the weekly checkups after the 36th week point were
excessive (!!!). Nonetheless, he agreed that she would present herself back at
the hospital at her weekly appointment, which coincided with the 37th
week based on the embryo transfer date. Overall, Dr. Malpani’s philosophy (that
she should stay home for as long as possible, and only make her way to the
hospital when “labor was eminent”) filled us with utter dread, and to our utter
helplessness, he was the person calling the shots at that point. Waiting for
that checkup date to arrive was an experience no one in my family ever wants to
live through again.
Ironically, while Dr. Malpani was
pushing for a natural birth, the surrogate herself had no intention of a
natural birth, and asked for a c-section. This was a really comic situation,
if you took away the very high stakes.
While I am also very much a fan of
natural delivery over c-section, the surrogate’s wishes had to come first in my
book: to try to get an unwilling woman to go for a vaginal delivery is a
ridiculously bad idea, in addition to being unfair to her.
This aside, it was rather amazing
that what I (as the biological mother) wanted as per day of delivery and plan
of action apparently figured so little with Dr. Malpani. Our situation was even
more ironic considering that the system is supposed to work in a way where the
person who sets up the surrogacy program is supposed to help the biological parent, communicate the day-to-day events
clearly, take their wishes into consideration (this is their child after all),
and ensure that the process is as less tension-fraught as possible.
The
birth:
What happened on the day of
delivery: On the day she was discharged against medical advice, the OB ran a
high vaginal swab that was clear, showing no infection. When she returned for
the agreed-upon checkup one week later, she had a greenish vaginal discharge,
which is normally indicative of a trichomonal infection (an STD). Thank
god I did not know this when the OB told me about the discharge.
Alarmed, the OB planned a C-section,
which also coincided with the surrogate’s wishes. After the birth on the same
day, my baby had excellent Apgar scores and met all the benchmarks of maturity,
but had rapid breathing and grunting which is sometimes observed after a
c-section. They admitted her in the NICU for monitoring, expecting that it
should clear up within the next 12 hours. When it had not, the pediatrician
suspected infection (he says he sees this sometimes in babies born of
surrogates), and preemptively started antibiotics.
Within 24 hours of being on the
antibiotic, the respiratory distress had cleared, but a blood test showed mild
sepsis. Given that this was an otherwise healthy and subsequently hardy baby,
it seems unlikely to me this was a hospital-acquired infection, and seemed more
likely that this was something unexplained acquired in utero. When
I think about the fact that her vaginal swab at the time of her discharge
against medical advice was clear, that she showed up one week later with likely
an STD, and the fact that my baby had a respiratory infection that looked like
it was acquired in utero, I get really, really angry. The universe
and the doctors at Hiranandani were really watching out for this child, so it
all ended well, thank god, despite the 4 pregnancies the surrogate had carried
before this one, despite the Rh mismatch, and despite the infection that J
apparently had in the end. I think getting Gauri out when we did may have resulted
in us catching the infection at an early timepoint when it was easily
controllable. And for that, thank you, forces above, and Dr. Soni (the OB) and
Dr. Ahuja (the pediatrician).
I honestly very much wish I had
known about the nitty gritty of surrogacy in India before I had started this,
and today, I make this information available to you all. Make of all this what
you will, but had I known what I know now, I would NEVER have gone to Dr.
Malpani for surrogacy. I would definitely have been spared a ton of stress
(especially in the horrible final three weeks), and who knows, my daughter may
have not needed that NICU stay and those repeated invasions of her oh-so-tiny
veins. The day they stuck yet another IV in her for the fifth time in one week,
our hearts broke.
The next part will be the finances
of surrogacy with Dr. Malpani: that definitely requires a blogpost of its
own.
Thank you for sharing all this information. It seems like there should be more transparency in this type of situation than you were offered.
ReplyDeleteI knew it wasn't the best experience, but putting it all together makes it horrifying. I'm so glad you're sharing it here, and hope it helps others avoid the same type experience in the future.
ReplyDeleteThis is great information for potential IPs. Too often, once a baby is born, parents forget all the hiccups in the process and they go unreported. I understand that, but it doesn't serve this community. I admire that you posted about most of these issues as they happened. Some IPs who blog feel intimidated to do that. I always tell people considering surrogacy in India to talk to previous clients on the phone. You've provided an excellent resource.
ReplyDeleteWe used Surrogacy India and had an amazing experience. Sometimes when I speak to potential clients I feel like I'm being too positive and they suspect I'm on the payroll (I'm not, but we all know that happens in this industry.) We used another clinic previous to SI, and regardless of our negatives and early loss, SI was was better. We did have success on our first cycle with SI, so that definitely adds to my complete adoration of Dr Sudhir and Dr Yash. No matter what, though, surrogacy is not ideal. Ideal would have been carrying my own baby and having 100% control over the situation. You do need to cede a lot of control through this process. Thankfully, you had a wonderful outcome. A few more grey hairs, I'm sure, but your little girl arrived safe and sound.
Dr Soni and Dr Ahuja are rockstars. I confidently compare the care my son and surrogate received at Hiranandani to the care my daughter and I received at Cedars Sinai in Los Angeles when she was born. The doctors were also completely supportive of inducing lactation. Dr Ahuja prescribed me herbs and assured me that it could work. Dr Soni insisted the nurses let me nurse my son moments after he was born.
I'm really curious to see how the financial aspect compares. I'm also looking forward to hearing more about your little girl.
Wow. Thank you for writing this. Amazing what you had to go through to get your Gauri into your arms.
ReplyDeleteI had a rather different experience with Dr. Malpani, and I thought that overall he did a good job of communicating and keeping us in the loop. We had our daughter Gloria in January of 2013, and although there were times when we were stressed and wondering how the surrogate was doing, ultimately, we probably would not have been able to have a child without the Malpani Clinic. That was just our experience, though.
ReplyDelete